Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8644

Re: Which of the two Proxy or RFC is preferred in PI 7.31?

$
0
0

Hi Lavanya,

 

Whether it is a single stack or dual stack system, it is always better to use Proxy, until and unless there is a business demand to use RFC.

 

Proxy

 

--> Proxy communication is better than RFC/BAPI communication when performance is concerned.

--> ABAP Proxies uses Web service and HTTP Protocols. 

--> Proxies is used for both Sync and Async. If you use ABAP Proxy , you can reduce the overhead calling             the function again and again..

--> Proxies communicate with the XI server by means of native SOAP calls over HTTP .

--> Proxy is used for large volumes of data.

--> proxy it is used to process the Mapping and rooting on Integration Engine bypass the Adapter.

-->  In proxy XI communicates with the R/3 in native XI language (SOAP XML).

 

RFC


--> RFC/BAPI has its own overhead of function call.

--> RFC, the data is converted between RFC and XML in RFC adapter.

--> So you have to convert from SOAP to RFC calls and vice versa. So XML conversion is required.

--> RFC is more riscy becoz of less stability and bad performance.

--> You have an additional application (Java Adapter Engine) running during message exchange.

 

 

Regards

Bhargava krishna


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8644

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>